Why isn’t there better mobile support for these apps? Doesn’t everyone else read PDFs on their mobile like me these days instead of on a computer?
REFERENCE MANAGER 12 FREE DOWNLOAD ANDROID
So I end up using CUL’s web interface on my Android - works OK but they don’t have good small-screen support so it’s annoying. Honestly if one of these apps had a decent Android app I’d probably switch to them, but none of them seem to. This is annoying, but it’s worth it to me (I’ve also tried Zotero but I still really prefer CUL’s fast entirely web-based interface). To do that I have to export to Zotero and use them. With Mendeley I would sometimes follow a link, hit “back,” and then sit growling in frustration while the page slowly rebuilt.Īlso CUL makes it super easy to point people to your list of references - something Mendeley STILL does not do (WHY?!).īiggest downside to CUL is the lack of integration with word processors for adding citations to papers. Which means your browser can cache pages and you don’t have to wait for minutes while a page displays. I prefer CUL mostly because it is HUGELY faster than Mendeley – it has an HTML-based interface instead of Mendeley’s Javascript-based one. I use CiteULike (I switched to Mendeley briefly and promptly switched back. This is not the most efficient way to do it – as I don’t actually cite most papers I read (seminars/classes/general interest) – yet in order to find the right ones for citing, I need to go through all the erroneously labelled ones and fix them – this adds hours each time I do a bibliography (if I published papers more often, this would be less of a problem…). It won’t even let you put in all the necessary information sometimes.ģ) This is a personal gripe that probably everyone doesn’t have, but I put all my papers in one references folder, which Mendeley grabs from. Probably doing that properly is hard, but they could at least give warnings, when one of your 150 refs is in title case.ġ) It imports absolute shit for most JSTOR papers (Ecology, AmNat, etc.) and a few other services (and all scans) – unless it is recent, you pretty much have to enter everything yourself – even when it can find the reference with the title search function, it usually deletes authors or puts erroneous volume numbers and years.Ģ) As mentioned above, it struggles with books/chapters/non-journal references. I think it’s unfortunate that neither of those apps has a social component (so if thousands of users fix a buggy reference, they don’t take notice) and neither does stuff like changing title case/sentence case according to CSL. I use the standalone client, since the plugins tended to slow my browser down if I had a big library (a while ago, maybe they fixed it).Īt least Mendeley didn’t lock me in that badly (though my notes and folders were lost). Zotero didn’t have this problem and I’ve been happily using it since. I filed a bug report for this and I’m still tracking it after I left Mendeley for good. It crashed too, but the slowness was what made me want to punch my computer. I had to switch from Mendeley to Zotero in the middle of submitting a paper with 150 references, because the more references I added, the slower Mendeley became, at one point it would take several minutes until I had added a reference. Nota bene: If you write your manuscripts in LaTeX, I don’t think I can really handle hearing even more about its awesomeness. But I’m really curious to see the results of the poll.Īny thoughts about reference managers, what works and what doesn’t, and if you’ve changed from one system to another, any good ideas? Or unsubstantiated opinions?
![reference manager 12 free download reference manager 12 free download](https://cdn.fileplanet.com/gen_screenshots/en-US/windows/fifa-manager-12/large/fifa-manager-12-demo-03-700x437.jpg)
It plays nicely with my version of Word and crashes infrequently enough that I haven’t yet damaged my laptop by punching it.Īs far as I can tell, a lot of folks are using Mendeley. Two weeks and one manuscript later, I think it’s coming along pretty well. In the Mendeley there already are a huge set of collected references, and its integration with web searching for new citations is super-smooth. But I had a difficult time importing my old endnote library (and my endnote version expired and wouldn’t let me do it, long story). But Mendeley was bought by Elsevier last year, which has a number of downsides. And I’m not paying money for a program that will go out of date next year. I’m writing in Word to share files with collaborators.
![reference manager 12 free download reference manager 12 free download](https://static.macupdate.com/screenshots/23099/m/mendeley-reference-manager-lite-screenshot.png)
I’ve been looking for a New Way for the last year or so, after year or two of doing it old school. If you’re not using Endnote, for the love of some deity, don’t let yourself be tempted. A sucky, glitchy, hard to use product, by the way.
REFERENCE MANAGER 12 FREE DOWNLOAD SOFTWARE
But they end up releasing new versions of the software twice as fast as new editions of Campbell’s Biology and it’s just stupid to keep paying a company over and over for the same damn product.
![reference manager 12 free download reference manager 12 free download](https://www.smartsheet.com/sites/default/files/2020-06/IC-Client-Creative-Brief-Template.png)
At one point, many years ago, I used Endnote.